the glorious revolution was a peacefull turn for the british. Instead of a blood filled war, Englands treatment of the colonies how ever result in many wars.
There is a major contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and the England’s treatment of the American colonies. The Glorious Revolution became known to be the Glorious Revolution when William and Mary marched into England causing James and his wife to flee, turning power over to William and Mary. It was considered a Glorious Revolution because there was no blood shed. When the colonies asked for freedom and a separation from Britain in return they got 30,000 German troops that were hired by Britain to fight the colonies. Only after seven years did the colonies gain their independence, but a lot of fighting took place. That is the major contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and England’s treatment of the American colonies.
The Glorious Revoltion was a relatively bloodless conquest without much restrain by the citizens of England. On the other hand, England unfairly taxed and opposed laws on the American colonies, and this lead to the American Revolution.
There is a very big contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and England's treatment of the American colonies. The Glorious Revolution was not a violet or bloody war at all when William and Mary come in and take power. But England's Treatment of the American colonies was the total opposite. England was treating the colonies very bad and unfair and they sent German troops to fight against the colonies.
The contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and England's treatment of the American colonies was that the Glorious Revolution was a bloodless battle with William and Mary ruling,But they also unfairly taxed American colonies which later lead to the American Revolution
There are huge differences between the Glorious Revolution and the way England treated the colonies. For starters, the Glorious Revolution was a time for higher thought processes and anti violence, just like the enlightenment period. The war between the colonies and England differs from the Glorious Rev. because there was a lot of bloodshed and their was little thought, aside from the drafting of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
colin nierenberg period 3 10/15/10 The contradiction is that the glorious revolution was without bloodshed and the war between england and the colonies was filled with many battles and alot of deaths for the colonies to have independence.
Natascha Ibrahim per3 The Glorious Revolution was pretty much a more peaceful conquest for the British while the England's treatment of the colonies was more intense resulting in a long, bloody seven year war.
There was much bloodshed in the war between America and England for independence. The Glorious Revolution was made glorious by William and Mary's coup which resulted in no fatalities. That is the contradiction between the two nations.
The Glorious revolution was a war without bloodshed. As for the American Revolution, there were many gore-filled battles and the war had major losses on both sides.
The Glorious Revolution began when William and Mary came to England and gained power without fatalities and blood shed. England did not want Americans to be free from their power, so when the colonists asked for freedom, Britain did not allow it. In turn, there was a bloody seven year war. The colonists did gain independence but with many fatalities. This is the difference between the Glorious Revolution and England's treatment of the American colonies.
There was a huge contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and Britians treatment of the colonies. The Glorious Revolution was peaceful relatively speaking and the way they treated the colonies was brutal and bloody.
The Glorious Revolution was so glorious because there was no bloodshed and violence. The American Revolution had more violence with much more fighting than the Glorious Revolution.
In the glorious revolution power was transfered from the monarch to the people. There is a contradiction between the glorious revolution and England's treatment of the colonies because they disallow the colonies to govern themselves.
The Glorious Revolution and the way the English treated are Totally different. The Glorious Rev. had no bloodshed at all. Was not really violent unlike the way the english treated the colonies. It was plenty of bloodshed.
Yes,the contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and England's treatment of the American colonies was that there was no bloodshed for the glorious Revolution.But the American Colonies were taxed unfairly.
the glorious revolution was a peacefull turn for the british. Instead of a blood filled war, Englands treatment of the colonies how ever result in many wars.
ReplyDeleteThere is a major contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and the England’s treatment of the American colonies. The Glorious Revolution became known to be the Glorious Revolution when William and Mary marched into England causing James and his wife to flee, turning power over to William and Mary. It was considered a Glorious Revolution because there was no blood shed. When the colonies asked for freedom and a separation from Britain in return they got 30,000 German troops that were hired by Britain to fight the colonies. Only after seven years did the colonies gain their independence, but a lot of fighting took place. That is the major contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and England’s treatment of the American colonies.
ReplyDeleteThe Glorious Revolution was peaceful compared to England's treatment of the colonies which was a bloody seven year war.
ReplyDeleteSawyer Hayes
ReplyDeleteperiod 3
The Glorious Revoltion was a relatively bloodless conquest without much restrain by the citizens of England. On the other hand, England unfairly taxed and opposed laws on the American colonies, and this lead to the American Revolution.
Chris Brodbeck
ReplyDeletePeriod 3
There is a very big contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and England's treatment of the American colonies. The Glorious Revolution was not a violet or bloody war at all when William and Mary come in and take power. But England's Treatment of the American colonies was the total opposite. England was treating the colonies very bad and unfair and they sent German troops to fight against the colonies.
Hannah Frankl
ReplyDeletePeriod 3
The contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and England's treatment of the American colonies was that the Glorious Revolution was a bloodless battle with William and Mary ruling,But they also unfairly taxed American colonies which later lead to the American Revolution
nima
ReplyDeleteperiod 3
There are huge differences between the Glorious Revolution and the way England treated the colonies. For starters, the Glorious Revolution was a time for higher thought processes and anti violence, just like the enlightenment period. The war between the colonies and England differs from the Glorious Rev. because there was a lot of bloodshed and their was little thought, aside from the drafting of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
colin nierenberg
ReplyDeleteperiod 3
10/15/10
The contradiction is that the glorious revolution was without bloodshed and the war between england and the colonies was filled with many battles and alot of deaths for the colonies to have independence.
Natascha Ibrahim
ReplyDeleteper3
The Glorious Revolution was pretty much a more peaceful conquest for the British while the England's treatment of the colonies was more intense resulting in a long, bloody seven year war.
There was much bloodshed in the war between America and England for independence. The Glorious Revolution was made glorious by William and Mary's coup which resulted in no fatalities. That is the contradiction between the two nations.
ReplyDeleteJacob Buchbinder
ReplyDeletePeriod 3
The Glorious revolution was a war without bloodshed. As for the American Revolution, there were many gore-filled battles and the war had major losses on both sides.
Katherine Kepski
ReplyDeletePeriod 3
The Glorious Revolution began when William and Mary came to England and gained power without fatalities and blood shed. England did not want Americans to be free from their power, so when the colonists asked for freedom, Britain did not allow it. In turn, there was a bloody seven year war. The colonists did gain independence but with many fatalities. This is the difference between the Glorious Revolution and England's treatment of the American colonies.
~Danielle Stavin~
ReplyDeletePeriod 3.
There was a huge contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and Britians treatment of the colonies. The Glorious Revolution was peaceful relatively speaking and the way they treated the colonies was brutal and bloody.
Leila Akhavan
ReplyDeletePeriod 3
The Glorious Revolution was so glorious because there was no bloodshed and violence. The American Revolution had more violence with much more fighting than the Glorious Revolution.
Cody T
ReplyDeleteper 3
In the glorious revolution power was transfered from the monarch to the people. There is a contradiction between the glorious revolution and England's treatment of the colonies because they disallow the colonies to govern themselves.
Marshall Faulk
ReplyDeleteper. 3
The Glorious Revolution and the way the English treated are Totally different. The Glorious Rev. had no bloodshed at all. Was not really violent unlike the way the english treated the colonies. It was plenty of bloodshed.
Darian saidi
ReplyDeletePeriod 3
The Glorious Revolution was peaceful and the England's treatment was bloody.
Yes, parliament was an issue between both of them.
ReplyDeletejack nelson
ReplyDeletep.3
yea, parliament created conflict in both cases
yes in the glorious revolution there was no blood spilt but in the american colonies they were treated really bad which resulted in wars
ReplyDeleteSpencer: yes, the glorious revolution wasn't that violent. The citizens of England didn't have must restrain. But England passed unfair laws and taxes
ReplyDeleteAlex manzanares
ReplyDeletePeriod 3
Yes,the contradiction between the Glorious Revolution and England's treatment of the American colonies was that there was no bloodshed for the glorious Revolution.But the American Colonies were taxed unfairly.